New confiscation laws coming into force this week will allow the state to seize businesses used to make scams or hide the proceeds of crime. However, the owners of such businesses could lose control of them long before a final conviction for fraud - as soon as an investigation begins.
It will all depend on the prosecutor. If he is convinced that the case will end with a conviction and there is a good chance of forfeiture, he will establish a forfeiture order at his discretion. management compulsory and appoint an administrator from among persons holding a restructuring advisor license.
According to the new provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Article 292b), it is also possible to secure an enterprise belonging to a collective entity if the evidence collected indicates that it may be held liable for a prohibited act. In other words, the compulsory administrator will enter into both small businesses owned by both a natural person and a joint-stock company listed on the stock exchange.
For this reason, among others, the ministry wants to make the task of the investigators appointing counsel easier. However, it does so - as experts point out - ineptly.
Draft amendment to the act on licensing restructuring adviser places quantitative criteria above qualitative ones.
In her view, an experienced restructuring advisor who has been conducting only a few large proceedings for a few years, despite objectively greater achievements, qualifications and professional preparation, will not be authorised.
Quantitative criterion
The solution to the problem in the opinion of specialists is simple. It would be sufficient to specify in the bill that an alternative prerequisite for obtaining the title of qualified restructuring adviser is to conduct bankruptcy proceedings with a certain total value of the bankruptcy estate (e.g. min. PLN 50 million).
However, this is not agreed to by the Ministry of Justice. The Justice Ministry argues that the awarding of best practice must be devoid of any arbitrariness. In order to avoid this, it is necessary to rely solely on the testimony of professionals. Because according to the reasoning of the officials, the more cases a counsellor has conducted, the better professional he/she is.
He points out that when dealing with large companies, it is important to have experience in all areas of the business as well as in raising finance. This knowledge, in turn, may be lacking for many advisers, even if they have conducted hundreds of proceedings.
In her view, it is difficult, after all, to imagine an adviser running an individual practice - even the best one - being in two places at the same time. And such a need often arises in large proceedings.
